Friday, February 1, 2013

Friday February 1, 2013

Much of the social history of the Western world, over the past three decades, has been a history of replacing what worked with what sounded good. — Thomas Sowell







Already, 25 of the 50 states have declared, as is their prerogative under the 2,700-page law, that they will refuse to set up Obamacare health-insurance exchanges. Another 7 states have said that they will administer some regulatory aspects of the exchanges but will leave the bulk of the work of determining eligibility for the new subsidies to the federal government. Only 18 states plus the District of Columbia are planning to take on the full responsibility for the administration of Obamacare.

Steadfast resistance by so many states is a welcome and important development. In addition to the signal that such resistance sends, Congress hasn’t authorized funding for the federally run Obamacare exchanges that would operate in place of state-based ones. Moreover, the plain language of the hastily cobbled-together law​—​which the administration is ignoring for the moment​—​says that taxpayer-financed subsidies can only be funneled through state-based exchanges, and not through federal ones. (Legal challenges are proceeding on this front.) In addition to opting out of establishing the exchanges, states can also refuse to implement Obamacare’s massive expansion of Medicaid.
According to estimates produced by one of us and former Congressional Budget Office director Douglas Holtz-Eakin, simply delaying the implementation of Obamacare by two years (until January 2016) would cut deficits by about $200 billion.
Delaying the implementation of Obamacare would be important for three reasons: It would save hundreds of billions of dollars in federal spending. It would spare Americans from having their health care premiums spike until a somewhat later date. And it would move the onset of Obamacare much closer to the 2016 presidentialelection, which would put Obama’s centerpiece legislation at center stage in that race​—​as the future health of the nation demands that it be. http://www.weeklystandard.com/articles/delay-repeal-replace_697829.html?page=2
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
First, obfuscation. They endeavor to “really brainwash people into thinking about guns in a vastly different way,” as Obama’s Attorney General Eric Holder said. They are redefining the Second Amendment as being codified to protect “the traditions of hunting and sport shooting,” in order to divert attention from the real reason our Founders codified the right to keep and bear arms: To support and defend our Constitution, and the Liberty it enshrines, as the last defense against statist politicos and tyrants.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
As Pamela Geller reported yesterday:
How do we know the man is an Arab or a Muslim? Maybe the fella in the desert is Druze or Zoroastrian...
Muslim Groups Call Coke Super Bowl Ad "Racist" Answering Muslims (thanks to David Wood)
Ever get the feeling that some people are so desperate to claim victim status, they'll complain about absolutely anything? Watch the following Coca Cola SuperBowl ad and see if you can spot the blatant racism against Arabs.
Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2013/02/muslim_protest_echoes_the_1960s_boycott_of_coca-cola_and_israel.html#ixzz2Je6PSjf3 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, while lamenting the partisanship of congressional Republicans who grilled her about the Benghazi attack, encouraged Republicans not to imitate the unwillingness to compromise evinced by terrorists in North Africa.http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2013/01/awful-hillary-clinton-warns-republicans-not-to-act-like-north-african-terrorists/ 
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What the Muslim Brotherhood's victory in Egypt meant was the end of any hope on the part of secularists, women, and especially Egyptian Christians who were yearning for equal rights and the beginning of a true and enlightened fledgling democracy. Instead, they will now be forced to endure ominous Islamic Sharia law restrictions on their few remaining rights.
Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2013/01/is_the_obama_administration_deliberately_feeding_the_flames_in_egypt.html#ixzz2Je7lizDJ 
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The head of the New York branch of a Hamas-affiliated group is seeking a seat on the New York City Council.
The New York Daily News reported that Zead Ramadan formally announced on Tuesday his plans to run for the City Council seat being vacated by Councilman Robert Jackson, who plans to run for Manhattan Borough President. http://weaselzippers.us/2013/01/30/cair-leader-to-run-for-seat-on-new-york-city-council/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Rand Paul says vote on amendment to stop sale of F-16s to Egypt is TOMORROW http://www.therightscoop.com/rand-paul-says-vote-on-amendment-to-stop-sale-of-f-16s-to-egypt-is-tomorrow/ -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In this broadcast of the Cybertribe News Network, a North Carolina Police Lieutenant calls in to give his first hand knowledge of preparations being made within his own department to train and prepare for martial law in the United States, possibly in the coming year.
Many similar reports are starting to trickle in from all across the country, through various independent media resources and even organizations like Oath Keepers. http://www.secretsofthefed.com/north-carolina-police-lieutenant-warns-of-plans-for-martial-law-in-2013-video/
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This is important. This is not hyperbole. This is not conspiracy. This is not hysteria. There is nothing about this post that is “over the top.” This is nothing more than taking people at their word and connecting those words to the full light of history. Now, let me explain why Al Gore’s latest should send chills down the spine of anyone and everyone who knows and understands history. Here’s the story – read it, watch the video:
Former Vice President Al Gore on Wednesday said people are scientifically predisposed to be liberal or conservative — a phenomenon that he believes is positive, on the whole, for the “human species.”
“I think, first of all, scientists now know that there is, in human nature, a divide between what we sometimes call ‘liberals’ and ‘conservatives,’” Gore said on MSNBC’s “Morning Joe.” “And it gives an advantage, you can speculate, to the human species to have some people who are temperamentally inclined to try to change the future, experiment with new things, and others who are temperamentally inclined to say, ‘Wait a minute, not too fast, let’s make sure we don’t do anything rash here.’”
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The American people should be outraged and demand answers after the secretary of state's testimony. Instead, it appears that but for a few, no one cares anymore and have shrugged away the issue. As she brilliantly fudged, dodged, and avoided taking responsibility, the Democrats on the panel uniformly treated her as a celebrity superhero who could compete with Lynda Carter for the role of "Wonder Woman." The congresswoman's reaction as she sat there listening to the Democrats: "Wow, they fawned over her. They appear to be drinking too much of the Kool-Aid. Maybe a little bit of probing on their part would have resulted in more answers so this would never happen again. Their attitude of move along, move along was pretty pathetic."

Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/2013/01/benghazi_footnote.html#ixzz2JeBStrlf 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The IRS has begun implementing Obamacare; starting in 2014, "people who choose not to buy insurance and don't qualify for an exemption from the mandate will have to pay a fine of $95."

The $95 penalty will increase to $695 in 2016, and continue to grow thereafter at a "pre-determined" rate.

Households that do not earn enough to pay federal income tax are exempt from the penalty of the mandate, as are persons who are temporarily unemployed or transitioning from one job to another.

The current rules of the healthcare overhaul also say that if you have insurance "for one day of a month," it will count as having coverage for that entire month.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The first Chinese investment occurred in October 2010 with the state-owned Chinese energy giant CNOOC buying a multibillion-dollar stake in 600,000 acres of South Texas oil and gas fields. CNOOC announced that it would pay up to $2.2 billion for a one-third stake in Chesapeake Energy assets.
On the surface, this would seem like a badly needed job-creating investment in a beleaguered domestic oil industry. The question then is why isn't our own government not only encouraging such investment but also removing further restrictions on American oil and gas exploration and development?


Read More At IBDhttp://news.investors.com/ibd-editorials/013113-642733-china-gobbles-up-american-energy-resources.htm#ixzz2JeDtTx1v
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
As the federal government moves forward to implement President Obama's Affordable Care Act, the Department of Health and Human Services is slated to spend millions of dollars promoting the unpopular legislation. In the face of this publicity blitz, it is worth remembering that the law was originally sold largely on four grounds—all of which have become increasingly implausible.

• Lower health-care costs. One key talking point for ObamaCare was that it would reduce the cost of insurance, especially for non-group insurance. The president, citing the work of several health-policy experts, claimed that improved care coordination, investments in information technology, and more efficient marketing through exchanges would save the typical family $2,500 per year.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Now that the economy is officially contracting, it’s a good time to look back and list the various Obama policies that are causing it. We do this not in the spirit of blame but rather to point to the corrective steps he needs to take to head off a new recession. After several quarters of optimistic but rigged data showing the economy growing at a 2 percent clip, the truth is emerging: We are on the verge of a double dip recession).

http://www.dickmorris.com/how-obama-is-causing-the-double-dip-recession/?utm_source=dmreports&utm_medium=dmreports&utm_campaign=dmreports
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.utahsheriffs.org/USA-Home_files/2nd%20Amendment%20Letter_1.pdf

No comments:

Post a Comment